Got out of Vegas alive but not without some absurdity. I was scheduled
to take the red-eye home on Sunday night at 11:30 p.m. Got to the
airport at 9:45 and was informed that the 11:30 flight was delayed and
was now a 3:30 a.m. flight. Uggggh. So I checked my bag, got my
boarding pass and circled back to the Strip for a bit more Omahahaha to
kill 3 or 4 more hours. Flight finally left closer to 4 a.m. and I got
home to Baltimore around 1. Obligatory hugs, etc. with the kids and Big
Man is fast asleep by 1:20.
Anyway, a bunch of interesting hands so I will likely do this in 2 or possibly 3 parts.
I played a total of ~64 hours over the week broken down about as follows:
5/10 NL 2 sessions ~8 hours
2/5 NL 6 sessions ~20 hours
1/3 NL 1 session ~3 hours
1/2/5 PLO 6 sessions ~20 hours
5/5 PLO 2 sessions ~10 hours
1/2/5 Big O 1 sesion ~2 hours
Misc 8/16 Mixed, 20/40 O8 ~2 hours
Fortunately I won at each game at each level.
In total I played ~64 hours for a profit of $4,686 or almost $74/hour.
Here are some of the more interesting hands I played:
The first 3 hands are with the same 2/5 villain and the first 2 hands
set up the 3rd. Villain is a baddish live LAG. Pretty sure I have seen
him at Borgata. He does the typical live-ish stuff we all see: open
limp, raise to see where he is, make desperation bluffs that make little
sense, etc.
My image is probably pretty aggressive, raising in position, etc.
Hand 1-Pay Attention!
2 limps including villain. I go $30 with A

K

Only villain calls.
(Pot ~$70) Flop T

5

3

He checks, I bet $45, he reluctantly calls. I think he is pretty weak
here and certainly doesn't have TP+ IMO..A4, A2, AJ+, 67s, 46s, etc are
all in his range along with perhaps 44, 66 type hands.
(Pot ~$160) 3

Now I guess fl draws are a part of his range but I just didn't think he
had a flush here. He checks, I still think I am good some % of the
time but I catch him looking at his cards before I act. For whatever
reason I immediately zoomed in on A

x and really feel that is what he was double checking. I don't think there is a ton of value in betting so I check it back.
(Pot ~$160) River is an absolute brick 8

He insta bets $100. Given my read and my belief that he had the bare A

the only hand that improved on this river is A8o and I just don't see
how he gets to the river with that hand. I decide to call. he shows A

Q

and I win a mid sized pot.
Key here was paying attention. When he went back and double checked his hand I really was confident he had A

. He began muttering and complaining that I called with AK high which leads to the next hand.
Stacking off with 1 pair
Villain now has ~480 and this is only an orbit or two later. I open A

Q

from EP to 20. Get 3 calls including villain in BB.
(Pot ~$80) A

6

4

Checks to me and I bet $55..folds to villain who c/r to $160. I think
for a moment and feel like his range here is 2 pr+, flush draws, maybe a
combo draw or two and probably worse Ax hands. So I flat.
(Pot ~$400) I'm pretty much calling any non

, 3, 5, 7 or 8. With a

I think I am folding to most ships..with the others I think I am
tanking a bit and am not sure how I'll react. Anyway turn is 2

and he ships $320ish. This changes very little unless he has exactly
35 so I call rather quickly. Judging by his reaction I am virtually
certain he has


.
Pot (~$1,040) River J

and he shows 5

8

for a flopped combo draw. I hold and drag a nice pot.
Now he is on raging tilt talking about me calling with 1 pair, etc. One
thing about bad regs is I don't think they have any clue about their
table image. I mean he is exuding tilt characteristics and thus I am
going to call him down lighter and lighter until he gets himself under
control.
This would lead to the next hand where he plays a hand totally face up and I just need to win a flip.
LOL overbet Jam
I open J

J

to 25 over a limper from MP. LP calls, BTN calls and tilter open ships
$400 from SB. I think this is an easy call given his table demeanor
and I guess an extremely tight range is like 99-QQ, AK, AQ, KQs. Given
that and the $100 dead in the pot calling $380 seems easy. I call (the
other callers are pretty ABC and never have me beat here).
| Hand | Pot equity | Wins | Ties |
| JhJd | 57.47% | 53,115,779 | 2,020,785 |
| AK, AQ, 99, TT, JJ, QQ, KQs | 42.53% | 39,040,156 | 2,020,785 |
Widen his range to include AJ, 66+, etc and it is obvious that calling here is trivial.
Note I think he almost NEVER has AA or KK here.
| Hand | Pot equity | Wins | Ties |
| JhJd | 63.79% | 87,290,943 | 2,379,687 |
| AK, AQ, AJ, 66-QQ, KQs | 36.21% | 49,025,994 | 2,379,687 |
He tables A

Q


then basically begs me to run it twice. I agree. I have no problem
running it twice. I feel like it is something the weaker players really
rely on and I think if they are comfortable I don't want them to not
play anymore because they are no longer comfortable. So I will often
agree to run it twice to appease them. I am fairly ambivalent on
running it twice and almost always leave it to the other dude.
Anyway we run it 2x and I lose both board. First to a flush and 2nd to a
rivered Q. After this I still hear him whining about me calling him
with AK and now with JJ. Unfortunately he would continue to spew off;
just not to me anymore.
Will follow with a few more good hands later including a fun river PLO bluff!